Demographics details for Elkhart, IN vs Chowchilla, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elkhart, IN vs Chowchilla, CA.
| Data | Elkhart | Chowchilla |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,801 | 18,738 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $46,534 | $67,212 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Elkhart vs Chowchilla
- In Elkhart, the population is higher at 53,801, compared to 18,738 in Chowchilla.
- Residents in Elkhart have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212, compared to $46,534 in Elkhart.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Elkhart at 27.0% compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- The poverty level is higher in Chowchilla at 19%, compared to 12% in Elkhart.
- The unemployment rate in Elkhart is higher at 5.5%, compared to 5.2% in Chowchilla.
Demographics
Demographics Elkhart vs Chowchilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elkhart | Chowchilla |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 6 |
| White | 53 | 29 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 48 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Elkhart vs Chowchilla
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Elkhart at 12% compared to 6% in Chowchilla.
- Elkhart has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- In Chowchilla, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Elkhart.
- Chowchilla has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 26% in Elkhart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chowchilla at 9%, compared to 8% in Elkhart.
- In Chowchilla, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Elkhart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elkhart | Chowchilla |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 22.5% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elkhart vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 18.8% in Elkhart.
- Depression is more prevalent in Elkhart at 26.6% compared to 23.3% in Chowchilla.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elkhart at 22.5% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chowchilla at 13.7% compared to 13.4% in Elkhart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Elkhart at 41.5% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elkhart at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elkhart | Chowchilla |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (638) | 1.4% (271) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (11,303) | 14.6% (2,738) |
| Less than High School | 21.9% (11,805) | 31.2% (5,842) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (5,742) | 9.2% (1,731) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elkhart vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Elkhart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkhart hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chowchilla at 31.2%, compared to 21.9% in Elkhart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkhart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.