Demographics details for Dearborn, MI vs Wapakoneta, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dearborn, MI vs Wapakoneta, OH.
| Data | Dearborn | Wapakoneta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,710 | 9,776 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $64,600 | $63,008 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Dearborn vs Wapakoneta
- In Dearborn, the population is higher at 107,710, compared to 9,776 in Wapakoneta.
- The median age in Wapakoneta is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600 compared to $63,008 in Wapakoneta.
- In Wapakoneta, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Wapakoneta.
- Wapakoneta has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics Dearborn vs Wapakoneta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dearborn | Wapakoneta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 86 | 89 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dearborn vs Wapakoneta
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dearborn at 3% compared to 1% in Wapakoneta.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wapakoneta at 89% compared to 86% in Dearborn.
- The Asian population is larger in Dearborn at 3% compared to 0% in Wapakoneta.
- Wapakoneta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- Both Dearborn and Wapakoneta have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dearborn and Wapakoneta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dearborn | Wapakoneta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dearborn vs Wapakoneta
- More residents in Dearborn report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.1% in Wapakoneta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dearborn at 26.6% compared to 23.8% in Wapakoneta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dearborn at 24.6% compared to 21.3% in Wapakoneta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wapakoneta at 18.8% compared to 17.6% in Dearborn.
- Wapakoneta has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wapakoneta at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dearborn | Wapakoneta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,058) | 0.1% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (13,249) | 26.9% (2,625) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (18,849) | 11.8% (1,157) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (22,938) | 14.0% (1,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dearborn vs Wapakoneta
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.1% in Wapakoneta.
- In Wapakoneta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
- More residents in Dearborn have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 11.8% in Wapakoneta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dearborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 14.0% in Wapakoneta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.