Demographics details for Dawson, GA vs Decker, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dawson, GA vs Decker, MI.
| Data | Dawson | Decker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,138 | 953 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $84,516 | $56,875 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Dawson vs Decker
- In Dawson, the population is higher at 30,138, compared to 953 in Decker.
- Residents in Dawson have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 35.1 years in Decker.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516 compared to $56,875 in Decker.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dawson at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in Decker.
- Dawson has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Decker.
- The unemployment rate in Dawson is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Decker.
Demographics
Demographics Dawson vs Decker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dawson | Decker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 88 | 98 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dawson vs Decker
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Dawson and Decker at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Decker at 98% compared to 88% in Dawson.
- The Asian population is larger in Dawson at 1% compared to 0% in Decker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dawson at 5% compared to 0% in Decker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Dawson at 5% compared to 1% in Decker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dawson and Decker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dawson | Decker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.1% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dawson vs Decker
- More residents in Dawson report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dawson at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dawson at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dawson at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dawson at 32.5% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dawson at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Decker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dawson | Decker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (446) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (3,376) | 19.9% (190) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (4,610) | 17.0% (162) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (6,943) | 6.9% (66) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dawson vs Decker
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- In Decker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Decker at 17.0%, compared to 15.3% in Dawson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dawson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 6.9% in Decker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.