Environment details: Dawson GA
Below average; focus on cleanup needed.
Environment details: Decker MI
Average; local conservation efforts show promise.
Compare Environment: Dawson GA vs Decker MI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Dawson | Decker |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 993 | 1183 |
Water Quality | 4/10 | 5/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Below average; focus on cleanup needed. | Average; local conservation efforts show promise. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.6 | 1.82 |
Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 31 | 42 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Dawson vs Decker
- The water quality in Decker is superior at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Dawson.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Decker with an average index of 1.82 compared to 1.6 in Dawson.
- Decker experiences more days with poor air quality at 42 compared to 31 in Dawson.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.