Demographics details for Culver city, CA vs Murfreesboro, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Culver city, CA vs Murfreesboro, TN.

Data Culver city Murfreesboro
Population 39,515 162,398
Median Age 41.5 years 31.5 years
Median Income $114,429 $70,451
Married Families 43.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 3.0

Population Comparison: Culver city vs Murfreesboro

  • The population in Murfreesboro is higher at 162,398, compared to 39,515 in Culver city.
  • Residents in Culver city have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
  • Culver city has a higher median income of $114,429 compared to $70,451 in Murfreesboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Culver city at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Murfreesboro at 10%, compared to 9% in Culver city.
  • The unemployment rate in Culver city is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.

Demographics

Demographics Culver city vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Culver city Murfreesboro
Black 8 17
White 38 66
Asian 18 3
Hispanic 21 7
Two or More Races 15 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Culver city vs Murfreesboro

  • In Murfreesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 8% in Culver city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Murfreesboro at 66% compared to 38% in Culver city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Culver city at 18% compared to 3% in Murfreesboro.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Culver city at 21% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Culver city at 15% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Culver city and Murfreesboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Culver city Murfreesboro
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 11.6%
Depression 15.2% 26.5%
Smoking 7.5% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 15.5%
Obesity 24.1% 34.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Culver city vs Murfreesboro

  • In Murfreesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.1% in Culver city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Murfreesboro at 26.5% versus 15.2% in Culver city.
  • Murfreesboro has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 7.5% in Culver city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Culver city at 16.5% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
  • Murfreesboro has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 24.1% in Culver city.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Culver city and Murfreesboro at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Culver city Murfreesboro
No Schooling 1.3% (501) 0.6% (920)
High School Diploma 7.6% (3,000) 10.7% (17,362)
Less than High School 9.1% (3,605) 6.2% (10,101)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 49.0% (19,344) 23.4% (38,019)

Education Levels Comparison: Culver city vs Murfreesboro

  • A higher percentage of residents in Culver city have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Murfreesboro.
  • In Murfreesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.7% compared to 7.6% in Culver city.
  • More residents in Culver city have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 6.2% in Murfreesboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Culver city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.0% compared to 23.4% in Murfreesboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.