Environment details: Culver city CA
water quality is moderate with average management.
Environment details: Murfreesboro TN
water quality is decent but could use a boost.
Compare Environment: Culver city CA vs Murfreesboro TN
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Culver city | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 2592 | 741 |
Water Quality | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | water quality is moderate with average management. | water quality is decent but could use a boost. |
Median Air Quality | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 3.05 | 1.64 |
Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 219 | 33 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Culver city vs Murfreesboro
- Both cities report the same water quality at 5/10.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Culver city at 3.0 compared to 2.0 in Murfreesboro.
- The average air quality index is worse in Culver city with 3.05 compared to 1.64 in Murfreesboro.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Culver city at 219 compared to 33 in Murfreesboro.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.