Demographics details for Conroe, TX vs Murrysville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conroe, TX vs Murrysville, PA.
| Data | Conroe | Murrysville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101,405 | 20,724 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 50.1 years |
| Median Income | $71,630 | $117,067 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Conroe vs Murrysville
- In Conroe, the population is higher at 101,405, compared to 20,724 in Murrysville.
- The median age in Murrysville is higher at 50.1 years, compared to 33.5 years in Conroe.
- Murrysville has a higher median income of $117,067, compared to $71,630 in Conroe.
- In Murrysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 37.0% in Conroe.
- Conroe has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 4% in Murrysville.
- The unemployment rate in Conroe is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Murrysville.
Demographics
Demographics Conroe vs Murrysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Conroe | Murrysville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 50 | 90 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Conroe vs Murrysville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conroe at 10% compared to 1% in Murrysville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Murrysville at 90% compared to 50% in Conroe.
- In Murrysville, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Conroe.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Conroe at 26% compared to 2% in Murrysville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Conroe at 10% compared to 3% in Murrysville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Conroe at 1% compared to 0% in Murrysville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Conroe | Murrysville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 11.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 28.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conroe vs Murrysville
- More residents in Conroe report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 13.8% in Murrysville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Conroe at 22.5% compared to 19.6% in Murrysville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Conroe at 17.5% compared to 11.1% in Murrysville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Murrysville at 20.4% compared to 17.4% in Conroe.
- Obesity rates are higher in Conroe at 37.2% compared to 28.1% in Murrysville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Murrysville at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Conroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Conroe | Murrysville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (1,025) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (11,921) | 14.1% (2,929) |
| Less than High School | 15.0% (15,214) | 2.9% (600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (19,161) | 41.6% (8,613) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conroe vs Murrysville
- A higher percentage of residents in Conroe have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Murrysville.
- In Murrysville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 11.8% in Conroe.
- More residents in Conroe have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 2.9% in Murrysville.
- In Murrysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.6% compared to 18.9% in Conroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.