Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Alum creek, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Alum creek, WV.
| Data | Clayton | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 1,420 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $65,179 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Alum creek
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 1,420 in Alum creek.
- The median age in Alum creek is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 46.0 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $65,179 in Alum creek.
- In Alum creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 47.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clayton and Alum creek at 10%.
- Alum creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Alum creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | Data is updating |
| White | 61 | 100 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Alum creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Alum creek at 100% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Alum creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Alum creek
- In Alum creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alum creek at 29.5% versus 24.4% in Clayton.
- Alum creek has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 15.1% in Alum creek.
- Alum creek has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 37.4% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alum creek at 30.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 34.9% (496) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 8.9% (126) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 9.7% (138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Alum creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Alum creek.
- In Alum creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.9% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alum creek at 8.9%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 9.7% in Alum creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.