Environment details: Clayton OH
water quality is good with minor concerns.
Environment details: Alum creek WV
Very low quality; high pollution levels.
Compare Environment: Clayton OH vs Alum creek WV
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Clayton | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1552 | 707 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is good with minor concerns. | Very low quality; high pollution levels. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.75 | 1.6 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 40 | 26 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Clayton vs Alum creek
- Water quality is rated higher in Clayton at 7/10 compared to 3/10 in Alum creek.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Clayton with 1.75 compared to 1.6 in Alum creek.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Clayton at 40 compared to 26 in Alum creek.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.