Demographics details for Clarksville, TN vs Irving, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, TN vs Irving, TX.
| Data | Clarksville | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176,974 | 254,715 |
| Median Age | 30.1 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $62,688 | $76,686 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Irving
- The population in Irving is higher at 254,715, compared to 176,974 in Clarksville.
- The median age in Irving is higher at 32.4 years, compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
- Irving has a higher median income of $76,686, compared to $62,688 in Clarksville.
- In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clarksville and Irving at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksville is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.9% in Irving.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksville | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 13 |
| White | 55 | 11 |
| Asian | 3 | 22 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 43 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Irving
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksville at 22% compared to 13% in Irving.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 11% in Irving.
- In Irving, the Asian population stands at 22%, greater than 3% in Clarksville.
- Irving has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 11% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Irving at 11%, compared to 9% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksville and Irving at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksville | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Irving
- More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.9% in Irving.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 28.4% compared to 21.0% in Irving.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 20.1% compared to 15.4% in Irving.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Irving at 17.4% compared to 14.8% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 39.3% compared to 32.4% in Irving.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksville at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Irving.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksville | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (976) | 1.8% (4,699) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (24,180) | 10.3% (26,322) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (9,720) | 24.8% (63,108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (29,557) | 26.1% (66,363) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Irving
- In Irving, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 10.3% in Irving.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 24.8%, compared to 5.5% in Clarksville.
- In Irving, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 16.7% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.