Demographics details for Clarksdale, MS vs Bluefield, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksdale, MS vs Bluefield, WV.
| Data | Clarksdale | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,969 | 9,408 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $35,377 | $45,854 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 27% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bluefield
- In Clarksdale, the population is higher at 13,969, compared to 9,408 in Bluefield.
- The median age in Bluefield is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- Bluefield has a higher median income of $45,854, compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- In Bluefield, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 12% in Bluefield.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksdale is higher at 6.9%, compared to 3.1% in Bluefield.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksdale vs Bluefield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksdale | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 86 | 23 |
| White | 9 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bluefield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksdale at 86% compared to 23% in Bluefield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bluefield at 66% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- Both Clarksdale and Bluefield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Bluefield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bluefield at 8%, compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksdale and Bluefield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksdale | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 22.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 12.0% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 46.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bluefield
- In Bluefield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 19.3% in Clarksdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bluefield at 28.4% versus 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 25.2% compared to 21.4% in Bluefield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bluefield at 12.0% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksdale at 50.5% compared to 46.3% in Bluefield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bluefield at 27.0% compared to 19.0% in Clarksdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksdale | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (274) | 0.2% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (1,281) | 19.0% (1,788) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (2,130) | 16.0% (1,505) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (1,964) | 19.4% (1,826) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bluefield
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.2% in Bluefield.
- In Bluefield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bluefield at 16.0%, compared to 15.2% in Clarksdale.
- In Bluefield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.