Environment details: Clarksdale MS
poor quality; requires significant attention.
Environment details: Bluefield WV
Poor quality; significant contamination detected.
Compare Environment: Clarksdale MS vs Bluefield WV
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Clarksdale | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504.415592 | 707.316716 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality; requires significant attention. | Poor quality; significant contamination detected. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.67 | 1.63 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 29 | 19 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bluefield
- Water quality is rated higher in Clarksdale at 4/10 compared to 3/10 in Bluefield.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Clarksdale with 1.67 compared to 1.63 in Bluefield.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Clarksdale at 29 compared to 19 in Bluefield.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.