Demographics details for Cincinnati, OH vs Woodstock, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cincinnati, OH vs Woodstock, IL.

Data Cincinnati Woodstock
Population 309,513 25,665
Median Age 32.9 years 36.3 years
Median Income $49,191 $82,287
Married Families 24.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 17% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 5.7

Population Comparison: Cincinnati vs Woodstock

  • In Cincinnati, the population is higher at 309,513, compared to 25,665 in Woodstock.
  • The median age in Woodstock is higher at 36.3 years, compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
  • Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287, compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
  • In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
  • Cincinnati has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 8% in Woodstock.
  • The unemployment rate in Cincinnati is higher at 5.8%, compared to 5.7% in Woodstock.

Demographics

Demographics Cincinnati vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cincinnati Woodstock
Black 40 3
White 46 59
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 5 23
Two or More Races 6 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cincinnati vs Woodstock

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cincinnati at 40% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 59% compared to 46% in Cincinnati.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cincinnati at 3% compared to 2% in Woodstock.
  • Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 5% in Cincinnati.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 13%, compared to 6% in Cincinnati.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cincinnati and Woodstock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cincinnati Woodstock
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 10.7%
Depression 21.6% 20.2%
Smoking 21.3% 15.2%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 17.7%
Obesity 39.8% 32.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cincinnati vs Woodstock

  • More residents in Cincinnati report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cincinnati at 21.6% compared to 20.2% in Woodstock.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cincinnati at 21.3% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cincinnati at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in Woodstock.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cincinnati at 39.8% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cincinnati at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cincinnati Woodstock
No Schooling 0.9% (2,632) 0.9% (237)
High School Diploma 12.5% (38,643) 15.8% (4,047)
Less than High School 9.6% (29,753) 12.9% (3,314)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.4% (81,592) 21.0% (5,381)

Education Levels Comparison: Cincinnati vs Woodstock

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cincinnati and Woodstock at 0.9%.
  • In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 12.5% in Cincinnati.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 12.9%, compared to 9.6% in Cincinnati.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cincinnati hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.