Demographics details for Cedarbluff, MS vs Fifield, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedarbluff, MS vs Fifield, WI.
| Data | Cedarbluff | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 170 | 879 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 50.0 years |
| Median Income | $60,000 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fifield
- The population in Fifield is higher at 879, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
- The median age in Fifield is higher at 50.0 years, compared to 42.0 years in Cedarbluff.
- Cedarbluff has a higher median income of $60,000 compared to $50,000 in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedarbluff at 50.0% compared to 20.0% in Fifield.
- Cedarbluff has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Fifield.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cedarbluff and Fifield at 5.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Cedarbluff vs Fifield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedarbluff | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedarbluff at 25% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fifield at 100% compared to 70% in Cedarbluff.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedarbluff at 1% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedarbluff at 2% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedarbluff at 2% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedarbluff and Fifield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedarbluff | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fifield
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Cedarbluff and Fifield at 0.0%.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 0.0%.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Cedarbluff and Fifield at 0.0%.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Cedarbluff and Fifield at 0.0%.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 0.0%.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Cedarbluff and Fifield at 0.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedarbluff | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fifield
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cedarbluff and Fifield at 0.0%.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 0.0%.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 0.0%.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Cedarbluff and Fifield at 0.0%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.