Environment details: Cedarbluff MS
Water quality poor due to historical contamination.
Environment details: Fifield WI
Average quality; area’s historical concerns addressed.
Compare Environment: Cedarbluff MS vs Fifield WI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Cedarbluff | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504 | 740 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality poor due to historical contamination. | Average quality; area’s historical concerns addressed. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.58 | 1.6 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 27 | 14 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Cedarbluff vs Fifield
- The water quality in Fifield is superior at 5/10 compared to 3/10 in Cedarbluff.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Fifield with an average index of 1.6 compared to 1.58 in Cedarbluff.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Cedarbluff at 27 compared to 14 in Fifield.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.