Demographics details for Cedar rapids, IA vs Banning, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar rapids, IA vs Banning, CA.
| Data | Cedar rapids | Banning |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 136,429 | 30,683 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 42.8 years |
| Median Income | $66,895 | $54,083 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Banning
- In Cedar rapids, the population is higher at 136,429, compared to 30,683 in Banning.
- The median age in Banning is higher at 42.8 years, compared to 37.0 years in Cedar rapids.
- Cedar rapids has a higher median income of $66,895 compared to $54,083 in Banning.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar rapids at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Banning.
- The poverty level is higher in Banning at 14%, compared to 10% in Cedar rapids.
- Banning has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.3% in Cedar rapids.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar rapids vs Banning provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar rapids | Banning |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 7 |
| White | 78 | 21 |
| Asian | 3 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 48 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Banning
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cedar rapids at 9% compared to 7% in Banning.
- Cedar rapids has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 21% in Banning.
- In Banning, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Cedar rapids.
- Banning has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 4% in Cedar rapids.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Banning at 17%, compared to 6% in Cedar rapids.
- In Banning, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Cedar rapids.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar rapids | Banning |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Banning
- In Banning, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.5% in Cedar rapids.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar rapids at 21.3% compared to 18.5% in Banning.
- Banning has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Cedar rapids.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar rapids at 22.1% compared to 15.2% in Banning.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cedar rapids at 39.4% compared to 39.1% in Banning.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Banning at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar rapids | Banning |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (803) | 2.4% (749) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (20,356) | 18.4% (5,655) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (9,473) | 21.9% (6,720) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (30,460) | 11.4% (3,495) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar rapids vs Banning
- In Banning, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.6% in Cedar rapids.
- In Banning, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 14.9% in Cedar rapids.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Banning at 21.9%, compared to 6.9% in Cedar rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 11.4% in Banning.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.