Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Sacramento, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Sacramento, CA.

Data Cedar park Sacramento
Population 77,642 528,001
Median Age 37.6 years 35.2 years
Median Income $118,903 $78,954
Married Families 45.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 5.0

Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Sacramento

  • The population in Sacramento is higher at 528,001, compared to 77,642 in Cedar park.
  • Residents in Cedar park have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
  • Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903 compared to $78,954 in Sacramento.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar park at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sacramento at 12%, compared to 5% in Cedar park.
  • Sacramento has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar park vs Sacramento provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar park Sacramento
Black 3 12
White 55 26
Asian 12 19
Hispanic 20 29
Two or More Races 10 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Sacramento

  • In Sacramento, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
  • Cedar park has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
  • In Sacramento, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 12% in Cedar park.
  • Sacramento has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 20% in Cedar park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sacramento at 13%, compared to 10% in Cedar park.
  • In Sacramento, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cedar park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar park Sacramento
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 11.5%
Depression 24.1% 18.3%
Smoking 11.0% 13.7%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 14.5%
Obesity 31.0% 32.7%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Sacramento

  • In Sacramento, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cedar park at 24.1% compared to 18.3% in Sacramento.
  • Sacramento has a higher smoking rate at 13.7% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
  • Sacramento has higher obesity rates at 32.7% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacramento at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar park Sacramento
No Schooling 0.4% (287) 2.7% (14,512)
High School Diploma 8.9% (6,896) 11.7% (62,039)
Less than High School 4.1% (3,156) 14.7% (77,760)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.8% (27,785) 24.4% (128,743)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Sacramento

  • In Sacramento, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
  • In Sacramento, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.7% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacramento at 14.7%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 24.4% in Sacramento.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.