Demographics details for Cape girardeau, MO vs Burns, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cape girardeau, MO vs Burns, KS.
| Data | Cape girardeau | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,377 | 237 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $51,671 | $43,125 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Cape girardeau vs Burns
- In Cape girardeau, the population is higher at 40,377, compared to 237 in Burns.
- Residents in Cape girardeau have a higher median age of 33.6 years compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Cape girardeau has a higher median income of $51,671 compared to $43,125 in Burns.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cape girardeau at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Burns.
- The poverty level is higher in Burns at 14%, compared to 13% in Cape girardeau.
- The unemployment rate in Cape girardeau is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Cape girardeau vs Burns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cape girardeau | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 92 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cape girardeau vs Burns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cape girardeau at 14% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burns at 92% compared to 74% in Cape girardeau.
- The Asian population is larger in Cape girardeau at 3% compared to 0% in Burns.
- Burns has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Cape girardeau.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cape girardeau at 5% compared to 2% in Burns.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cape girardeau and Burns at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cape girardeau | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cape girardeau vs Burns
- More residents in Cape girardeau report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.5% in Burns.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cape girardeau at 25.9% compared to 21.2% in Burns.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cape girardeau at 21.0% compared to 17.4% in Burns.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burns at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Cape girardeau.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cape girardeau at 40.1% compared to 36.5% in Burns.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burns at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Cape girardeau.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cape girardeau | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (235) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (5,879) | 13.9% (33) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (3,802) | 43.0% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.6% (8,705) | 6.3% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cape girardeau vs Burns
- A higher percentage of residents in Cape girardeau have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cape girardeau hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 13.9% in Burns.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burns at 43.0%, compared to 9.4% in Cape girardeau.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cape girardeau hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 6.3% in Burns.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.