Demographics details for Burleson, TX vs Mcdonough, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burleson, TX vs Mcdonough, GA.
| Data | Burleson | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,381 | 30,340 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $87,312 | $77,804 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Burleson vs Mcdonough
- In Burleson, the population is higher at 53,381, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
- Residents in Burleson have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Burleson has a higher median income of $87,312 compared to $77,804 in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burleson at 39.0% compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcdonough at 13%, compared to 6% in Burleson.
- Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.0% in Burleson.
Demographics
Demographics Burleson vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burleson | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 70 |
| White | 66 | 14 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burleson vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 5% in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- Both Burleson and Mcdonough have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burleson at 17% compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burleson at 10% compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burleson and Mcdonough at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burleson | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burleson vs Mcdonough
- More residents in Burleson report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Mcdonough.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burleson at 23.3% compared to 19.6% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 15.2% in Burleson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 33.0% in Burleson.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Burleson and Mcdonough at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burleson | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (389) | 0.7% (221) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (7,733) | 14.8% (4,501) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (3,744) | 4.9% (1,500) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (8,907) | 16.1% (4,882) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burleson vs Mcdonough
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Burleson and Mcdonough at 0.7%.
- In Mcdonough, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 14.5% in Burleson.
- More residents in Burleson have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.