Demographics details for Bozeman, MT vs Orland park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bozeman, MT vs Orland park, IL.
| Data | Bozeman | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,123 | 57,511 |
| Median Age | 28.2 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,113 | $97,365 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Bozeman vs Orland park
- The population in Orland park is higher at 57,511, compared to 56,123 in Bozeman.
- The median age in Orland park is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Orland park has a higher median income of $97,365, compared to $74,113 in Bozeman.
- In Orland park, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Orland park.
- Orland park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Bozeman vs Orland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bozeman | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 86 | 76 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bozeman vs Orland park
- In Orland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 76% in Orland park.
- In Orland park, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Bozeman.
- Orland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- Both Bozeman and Orland park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bozeman at 1% compared to 0% in Orland park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bozeman | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 11.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 24.8% | 26.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bozeman vs Orland park
- More residents in Bozeman report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 13.2% in Orland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bozeman at 22.8% compared to 18.2% in Orland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bozeman at 12.6% compared to 11.7% in Orland park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 20.2% in Orland park.
- Orland park has higher obesity rates at 26.8% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Orland park at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bozeman | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (11) | 0.5% (297) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (3,187) | 16.1% (9,262) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (1,316) | 8.3% (4,763) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (20,038) | 31.9% (18,372) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bozeman vs Orland park
- In Orland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- In Orland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Orland park at 8.3%, compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bozeman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 31.9% in Orland park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.