Demographics details for Bowie, MD vs Texarkana, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowie, MD vs Texarkana, TX.
| Data | Bowie | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,192 | 35,778 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $138,797 | $48,054 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Bowie vs Texarkana
- In Bowie, the population is higher at 57,192, compared to 35,778 in Texarkana.
- Residents in Bowie have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 37.2 years in Texarkana.
- Bowie has a higher median income of $138,797 compared to $48,054 in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bowie at 41.0% compared to 32.0% in Texarkana.
- The poverty level is higher in Texarkana at 15%, compared to 5% in Bowie.
- Texarkana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.8% in Bowie.
Demographics
Demographics Bowie vs Texarkana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowie | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 58 | 39 |
| White | 24 | 46 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bowie vs Texarkana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bowie at 58% compared to 39% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Texarkana at 46% compared to 24% in Bowie.
- The Asian population is larger in Bowie at 3% compared to 2% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 8% in Bowie.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bowie at 7% compared to 4% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bowie and Texarkana at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowie | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.4% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 13.3% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 8.7% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowie vs Texarkana
- In Texarkana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 12.4% in Bowie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Texarkana at 23.4% versus 13.3% in Bowie.
- Texarkana has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 8.7% in Bowie.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Texarkana at 16.0% compared to 13.6% in Bowie.
- Texarkana has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 35.1% in Bowie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Texarkana at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Bowie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowie | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (531) | 0.9% (324) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (6,950) | 17.6% (6,286) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (3,399) | 11.9% (4,243) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.9% (20,525) | 15.9% (5,688) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowie vs Texarkana
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bowie and Texarkana at 0.9%.
- In Texarkana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 12.2% in Bowie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Texarkana at 11.9%, compared to 5.9% in Bowie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.9% compared to 15.9% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.