Demographics details for Blackfoot, ID vs Irving, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Blackfoot, ID vs Irving, IL.
| Data | Blackfoot | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,702 | 370 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $57,951 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Blackfoot vs Irving
- In Blackfoot, the population is higher at 12,702, compared to 370 in Irving.
- The median age in Irving is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 34.4 years in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher median income of $57,951 compared to $50,000 in Irving.
- In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 36.0% in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Irving.
- Irving has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Blackfoot.
Demographics
Demographics Blackfoot vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Blackfoot | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 71 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Blackfoot vs Irving
- In Irving, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Blackfoot.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Irving at 91% compared to 71% in Blackfoot.
- Both Blackfoot and Irving have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Blackfoot at 18% compared to 4% in Irving.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Blackfoot at 7% compared to 4% in Irving.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Blackfoot at 4% compared to 0% in Irving.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Blackfoot | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Blackfoot vs Irving
- In Irving, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.0% in Blackfoot.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.0%.
- Irving has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 15.8% in Blackfoot.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Irving at 17.3% compared to 14.3% in Blackfoot.
- Irving has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.0% in Blackfoot.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Irving at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Blackfoot.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Blackfoot | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (16) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (1,974) | 24.9% (92) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (1,678) | 20.5% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (1,726) | 9.2% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Blackfoot vs Irving
- A higher percentage of residents in Blackfoot have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Irving.
- In Irving, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 15.5% in Blackfoot.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 20.5%, compared to 13.2% in Blackfoot.
- A higher percentage of residents in Blackfoot hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 9.2% in Irving.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.