Demographics details for Beaverton, OR vs Lexington, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaverton, OR vs Lexington, TN.
| Data | Beaverton | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 97,053 | 7,952 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $88,899 | $45,877 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Beaverton vs Lexington
- In Beaverton, the population is higher at 97,053, compared to 7,952 in Lexington.
- Residents in Beaverton have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Lexington.
- Beaverton has a higher median income of $88,899 compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Beaverton at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 13%, compared to 7% in Beaverton.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Beaverton.
Demographics
Demographics Beaverton vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaverton | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 17 |
| White | 57 | 81 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beaverton vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 3% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 81% compared to 57% in Beaverton.
- The Asian population is larger in Beaverton at 12% compared to 0% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Beaverton at 18% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beaverton at 10% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaverton and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaverton | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 21.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 30.4% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 26.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 31.3% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverton vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 15.6% in Beaverton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 30.4% versus 22.9% in Beaverton.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaverton at 16.6% compared to 14.4% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 31.3% in Beaverton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaverton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaverton | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (619) | 0.4% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 9.8% (9,471) | 22.4% (1,783) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (7,010) | 14.6% (1,159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.9% (33,872) | 9.3% (740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaverton vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 9.8% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 14.6%, compared to 7.2% in Beaverton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.