Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Bixby, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Bixby, OK.
| Data | Baldwin park | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,455 | 29,800 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $76,002 | $93,765 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Bixby
- In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 29,800 in Bixby.
- Residents in Baldwin park have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 36.8 years in Bixby.
- Bixby has a higher median income of $93,765, compared to $76,002 in Baldwin park.
- In Bixby, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
- Baldwin park has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Bixby.
- The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 3.3% in Bixby.
Demographics
Demographics Baldwin park vs Bixby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Baldwin park | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | -25 | 71 |
| Asian | 23 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 75 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 11 |
| American Indian | 3 | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Bixby
- In Bixby, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bixby at 71% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 4% in Bixby.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 7% in Bixby.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 11% in Bixby.
- In Bixby, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 3% in Baldwin park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Baldwin park | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 14.7% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Bixby
- In Bixby, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bixby at 24.5% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Bixby has a higher smoking rate at 12.8% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bixby at 15.7% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
- Bixby has higher obesity rates at 32.1% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Baldwin park at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Bixby.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Baldwin park | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.5% (3,853) | 0.5% (154) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (12,587) | 10.8% (3,233) |
| Less than High School | 41.7% (28,939) | 5.5% (1,652) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (6,787) | 27.9% (8,313) |
Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Bixby
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.5% in Bixby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 10.8% in Bixby.
- More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 5.5% in Bixby.
- In Bixby, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.9% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.