Demographics details for Arthurdale, WV vs Fort scott, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Arthurdale, WV vs Fort scott, KS.

Data Arthurdale Fort scott
Population 287 7,615
Median Age 35.0 years 38.3 years
Median Income $55,000 $45,206
Married Families 60.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 15% 14%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Arthurdale vs Fort scott

  • The population in Fort scott is higher at 7,615, compared to 287 in Arthurdale.
  • The median age in Fort scott is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 35.0 years in Arthurdale.
  • Arthurdale has a higher median income of $55,000 compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Arthurdale at 60.0% compared to 36.0% in Fort scott.
  • Arthurdale has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Fort scott.
  • The unemployment rate in Arthurdale is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Fort scott.

Demographics

Demographics Arthurdale vs Fort scott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Arthurdale Fort scott
Black Data is updating 4
White 95 87
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 2 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Arthurdale vs Fort scott

  • In Fort scott, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Arthurdale.
  • Arthurdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 87% in Fort scott.
  • The Asian population is larger in Arthurdale at 1% compared to 0% in Fort scott.
  • Fort scott has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Arthurdale.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort scott at 6%, compared to 2% in Arthurdale.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arthurdale and Fort scott at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Arthurdale Fort scott
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.3%
Depression Data is updating% 23.2%
Smoking Data is updating% 22.8%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 42.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Arthurdale vs Fort scott

  • In Fort scott, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort scott at 23.2% versus 0.0% in Arthurdale.
  • Fort scott has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort scott at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
  • Fort scott has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Arthurdale Fort scott
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (30)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.7% (1,041)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.9% (1,285)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.5% (1,029)

Education Levels Comparison: Arthurdale vs Fort scott

  • In Fort scott, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
  • In Fort scott, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort scott at 16.9%, compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
  • In Fort scott, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.