Environment details: Arthurdale WV
water quality is low from nearby contaminants.
Environment details: Fort scott KS
poor quality, high pollution levels.
Compare Environment: Arthurdale WV vs Fort scott KS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Arthurdale | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 707 | 478 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is low from nearby contaminants. | poor quality, high pollution levels. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.64 | 1.7 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 27 | 25 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Arthurdale vs Fort scott
- Both cities report the same water quality at 4/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Fort scott with an average index of 1.7 compared to 1.64 in Arthurdale.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Arthurdale at 27 compared to 25 in Fort scott.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.