Demographics details for American fork, UT vs South bend, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in American fork, UT vs South bend, IN.

Data American fork South bend
Population 37,268 103,110
Median Age 28.0 years 33.4 years
Median Income $90,490 $49,056
Married Families 42.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 5% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.2

Population Comparison: American fork vs South bend

  • The population in South bend is higher at 103,110, compared to 37,268 in American fork.
  • The median age in South bend is higher at 33.4 years, compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher median income of $90,490 compared to $49,056 in South bend.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in American fork at 42.0% compared to 28.0% in South bend.
  • The poverty level is higher in South bend at 16%, compared to 5% in American fork.
  • South bend has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in American fork.

Demographics

Demographics American fork vs South bend provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic American fork South bend
Black Data is updating 25
White 84 47
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 9 16
Two or More Races 6 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: American fork vs South bend

  • In South bend, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 0% in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 47% in South bend.
  • In South bend, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in American fork.
  • South bend has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 9% in American fork.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South bend at 10%, compared to 6% in American fork.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both American fork and South bend at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric American fork South bend
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 14.0%
Depression 23.4% 24.9%
Smoking 6.7% 22.4%
Binge Drinking 8.5% 14.6%
Obesity 29.5% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: American fork vs South bend

  • In South bend, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South bend at 24.9% versus 23.4% in American fork.
  • South bend has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South bend at 14.6% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
  • South bend has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South bend at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level American fork South bend
No Schooling 0.6% (208) 1.2% (1,199)
High School Diploma 7.4% (2,742) 14.9% (15,409)
Less than High School 5.7% (2,134) 13.0% (13,380)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.3% (7,922) 18.2% (18,716)

Education Levels Comparison: American fork vs South bend

  • In South bend, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
  • In South bend, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South bend at 13.0%, compared to 5.7% in American fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in American fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 18.2% in South bend.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.