Demographics details for Summerville, SC vs Fort atkinson, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Summerville, SC vs Fort atkinson, WI.

Data Summerville Fort atkinson
Population 51,617 12,412
Median Age 38.8 years 42.0 years
Median Income $73,712 $72,215
Married Families 40.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 8% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 3.2

Population Comparison: Summerville vs Fort atkinson

  • In Summerville, the population is higher at 51,617, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
  • The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.8 years in Summerville.
  • Summerville has a higher median income of $73,712 compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
  • In Fort atkinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 40.0% in Summerville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort atkinson at 9%, compared to 8% in Summerville.
  • The unemployment rate in Summerville is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Summerville vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Summerville Fort atkinson
Black 20 Data is updating
White 67 89
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 8
Two or More Races 5 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Summerville vs Fort atkinson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Summerville at 20% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 67% in Summerville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Summerville at 2% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Summerville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Summerville at 5% compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerville and Fort atkinson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Summerville Fort atkinson
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 10.2%
Depression 21.6% 23.6%
Smoking 17.4% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 23.5%
Obesity 40.3% 34.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Summerville vs Fort atkinson

  • More residents in Summerville report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 21.6% in Summerville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Summerville at 17.4% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 17.9% in Summerville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Summerville at 40.3% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Summerville at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Summerville Fort atkinson
No Schooling 0.8% (406) 1.3% (160)
High School Diploma 14.6% (7,519) 20.8% (2,578)
Less than High School 7.1% (3,663) 12.9% (1,595)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.1% (10,871) 19.6% (2,436)

Education Levels Comparison: Summerville vs Fort atkinson

  • In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.8% in Summerville.
  • In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 14.6% in Summerville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort atkinson at 12.9%, compared to 7.1% in Summerville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Summerville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.