Demographics details for Haverhill, MA vs Cleveland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Haverhill, MA vs Cleveland, MS.
| Data | Haverhill | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,153 | 10,545 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 33.8 years |
| Median Income | $81,989 | $42,005 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Haverhill vs Cleveland
- In Haverhill, the population is higher at 67,153, compared to 10,545 in Cleveland.
- Residents in Haverhill have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 33.8 years in Cleveland.
- Haverhill has a higher median income of $81,989 compared to $42,005 in Cleveland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Haverhill at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Cleveland.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleveland at 24%, compared to 8% in Haverhill.
- Cleveland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.2% in Haverhill.
Demographics
Demographics Haverhill vs Cleveland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Haverhill | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 56 |
| White | 58 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Haverhill vs Cleveland
- In Cleveland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 4% in Haverhill.
- Haverhill has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 36% in Cleveland.
- In Cleveland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Haverhill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Haverhill at 24% compared to 1% in Cleveland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Haverhill at 13% compared to 5% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Haverhill and Cleveland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Haverhill | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 31.3% | 41.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Haverhill vs Cleveland
- More residents in Haverhill report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Cleveland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Haverhill at 24.3% compared to 20.4% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 14.9% in Haverhill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Haverhill at 17.6% compared to 12.7% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 31.3% in Haverhill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleveland at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Haverhill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Haverhill | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (663) | 0.9% (99) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (11,739) | 10.0% (1,059) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (8,500) | 13.3% (1,404) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (13,934) | 21.3% (2,242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Haverhill vs Cleveland
- A higher percentage of residents in Haverhill have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Cleveland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Haverhill hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 10.0% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleveland at 13.3%, compared to 12.7% in Haverhill.
- In Cleveland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 20.7% in Haverhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.