Demographics details for French camp, MS vs Oak harbor, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in French camp, MS vs Oak harbor, WA.
Data | French camp | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Population | 254 | 24,403 |
Median Age | 44.1 years | 31.7 years |
Median Income | $65,313 | $68,039 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: French camp vs Oak harbor
- The population in Oak harbor is higher at 24,403, compared to 254 in French camp.
- Residents in French camp have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 31.7 years in Oak harbor.
- Oak harbor has a higher median income of $68,039, compared to $65,313 in French camp.
- In Oak harbor, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in French camp.
- French camp has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Oak harbor.
- The unemployment rate in French camp is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Oak harbor.
Demographics
Demographics French camp vs Oak harbor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | French camp | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | 5 |
White | 83 | 56 |
Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 16 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: French camp vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in French camp at 14% compared to 5% in Oak harbor.
- French camp has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 56% in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in French camp.
- Oak harbor has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 0% in French camp.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oak harbor at 14%, compared to 3% in French camp.
- In Oak harbor, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in French camp.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | French camp | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 11.1% |
Depression | 24.4% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 20.5% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 36.2% | 31.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: French camp vs Oak harbor
- In Oak harbor, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.3% in French camp.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Oak harbor at 25.0% versus 24.4% in French camp.
- Smoking is more prevalent in French camp at 20.5% compared to 15.1% in Oak harbor.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oak harbor at 16.2% compared to 13.6% in French camp.
- Obesity rates are higher in French camp at 36.2% compared to 31.5% in Oak harbor.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oak harbor at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in French camp.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | French camp | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (106) |
High School Diploma | 6.3% (16) | 12.8% (3,133) |
Less than High School | 7.9% (20) | 5.7% (1,395) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.9% (76) | 17.6% (4,288) |
Education Levels Comparison: French camp vs Oak harbor
- In Oak harbor, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in French camp.
- In Oak harbor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 6.3% in French camp.
- More residents in French camp have less than a high school education at 7.9% compared to 5.7% in Oak harbor.
- A higher percentage of residents in French camp hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.9% compared to 17.6% in Oak harbor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.