Environment details: French camp MS
Moderate quality, improvement can be made.
Environment details: Oak harbor WA
Average quality; best after filtration.
Compare Environment: French camp MS vs Oak harbor WA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | French camp | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504 | 590 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality, improvement can be made. | Average quality; best after filtration. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.55 | 1.58 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 18 | 18 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: French camp vs Oak harbor
- Both cities report the same water quality at 5/10.
- Oak harbor has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in French camp.
- Air quality is better in Oak harbor with an average index of 1.58 compared to 1.55 in French camp.
- Both cities report the same number of days with poor air quality at 18.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.