Demographics details for Crescent city, CA vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crescent city, CA vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Crescent city | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,983 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $39,812 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Crescent city vs Picayune
- The population in Picayune is higher at 11,826, compared to 5,983 in Crescent city.
- The median age in Picayune is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 37.1 years in Crescent city.
- Crescent city has a higher median income of $39,812 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Picayune, the percentage of married families is higher at 27.0%, compared to 25.0% in Crescent city.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 0% in Crescent city.
- The unemployment rate in Crescent city is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.5% in Picayune.
Demographics
Demographics Crescent city vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crescent city | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 38 |
| White | 40 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 34 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crescent city vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 8% in Crescent city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Picayune at 55% compared to 40% in Crescent city.
- The Asian population is larger in Crescent city at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crescent city at 34% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Crescent city at 10% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Crescent city at 7% compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crescent city | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crescent city vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.3% in Crescent city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 18.4% in Crescent city.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 18.2% in Crescent city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crescent city at 17.4% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 34.1% in Crescent city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Crescent city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crescent city | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (89) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (826) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 46.6% (2,786) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (777) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crescent city vs Picayune
- A higher percentage of residents in Crescent city have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- In Picayune, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 13.8% in Crescent city.
- More residents in Crescent city have less than a high school education at 46.6% compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crescent city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.