Environment details: Crescent city CA
General quality indicators show no major flaws.
Environment details: Picayune MS
Average quality, sufficient for most.
Compare Environment: Crescent city CA vs Picayune MS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Crescent city | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 2592 | 504 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | General quality indicators show no major flaws. | Average quality, sufficient for most. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 4 | 32 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Crescent city vs Picayune
- Both cities report the same water quality at 5/10.
- Picayune has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Crescent city.
- Air quality is better in Picayune with an average index of 1.6 compared to 1.5 in Crescent city.
- Picayune experiences more days with poor air quality at 32 compared to 4 in Crescent city.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.