Demographics details for Chestnut mound, TN vs Kerman, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chestnut mound, TN vs Kerman, CA.

Data Chestnut mound Kerman
Population 215 16,208
Median Age 36.0 years 27.8 years
Median Income $50,000 $53,956
Married Families 51.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 5.5

Population Comparison: Chestnut mound vs Kerman

  • The population in Kerman is higher at 16,208, compared to 215 in Chestnut mound.
  • Residents in Chestnut mound have a higher median age of 36.0 years compared to 27.8 years in Kerman.
  • Kerman has a higher median income of $53,956, compared to $50,000 in Chestnut mound.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chestnut mound at 51.0% compared to 32.0% in Kerman.
  • Chestnut mound has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Kerman.
  • The unemployment rate in Chestnut mound is higher at 5.6%, compared to 5.5% in Kerman.

Demographics

Demographics Chestnut mound vs Kerman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chestnut mound Kerman
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 100 -12
Asian Data is updating 7
Hispanic Data is updating 81
Two or More Races Data is updating 22
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Chestnut mound vs Kerman

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Chestnut mound and Kerman at 0%.
  • Chestnut mound has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to -12% in Kerman.
  • In Kerman, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Kerman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 81%, compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kerman at 22%, compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • In Kerman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chestnut mound Kerman
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.8%
Depression Data is updating% 18.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chestnut mound vs Kerman

  • In Kerman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Kerman at 18.0% versus 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Kerman has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Kerman at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Kerman has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kerman at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chestnut mound Kerman
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.3% (694)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.4% (1,690)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 45.2% (7,334)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.3% (1,177)

Education Levels Comparison: Chestnut mound vs Kerman

  • In Kerman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • In Kerman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.4% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kerman at 45.2%, compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • In Kerman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.