Environment details: Chestnut mound TN
Moderate quality; suitable for use.
Environment details: Kerman CA
poor quality, influenced by nearby agricultural areas.
Compare Environment: Chestnut mound TN vs Kerman CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Chestnut mound | Kerman |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 741 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality; suitable for use. | poor quality, influenced by nearby agricultural areas. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.6 | 2.11 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 25 | 106 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Chestnut mound vs Kerman
- Water quality is rated higher in Chestnut mound at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Kerman.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Kerman with an average index of 2.11 compared to 1.6 in Chestnut mound.
- Kerman experiences more days with poor air quality at 106 compared to 25 in Chestnut mound.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.