Demographics details for Zumbro falls, MN vs Lumberton, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Zumbro falls, MN vs Lumberton, NC.

Data Zumbro falls Lumberton
Population 155 18,841
Median Age 36.6 years 37.2 years
Median Income $84,750 $41,314
Married Families 46.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 23%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 7.1

Population Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Lumberton

  • The population in Lumberton is higher at 18,841, compared to 155 in Zumbro falls.
  • The median age in Lumberton is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 36.6 years in Zumbro falls.
  • Zumbro falls has a higher median income of $84,750 compared to $41,314 in Lumberton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Zumbro falls at 46.0% compared to 25.0% in Lumberton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lumberton at 23%, compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • Lumberton has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 2.5% in Zumbro falls.

Demographics

Demographics Zumbro falls vs Lumberton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Zumbro falls Lumberton
Black Data is updating 37
White 99 36
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 9
Two or More Races 1 4
American Indian Data is updating 13

Demographics Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Lumberton

  • In Lumberton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 37% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • Zumbro falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 36% in Lumberton.
  • In Lumberton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • Lumberton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lumberton at 4%, compared to 1% in Zumbro falls.
  • In Lumberton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Zumbro falls Lumberton
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 15.8%
Depression 23.3% 22.8%
Smoking 17.2% 25.2%
Binge Drinking 21.7% 13.9%
Obesity 36.5% 44.4%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Lumberton

  • In Lumberton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.4% in Zumbro falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Zumbro falls at 23.3% compared to 22.8% in Lumberton.
  • Lumberton has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 17.2% in Zumbro falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Zumbro falls at 21.7% compared to 13.9% in Lumberton.
  • Lumberton has higher obesity rates at 44.4% compared to 36.5% in Zumbro falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lumberton at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Zumbro falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Zumbro falls Lumberton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (161)
High School Diploma 17.4% (27) 16.6% (3,130)
Less than High School 1.3% (2) 19.2% (3,624)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.9% (34) 14.5% (2,730)

Education Levels Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Lumberton

  • In Lumberton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Zumbro falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Zumbro falls hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 16.6% in Lumberton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lumberton at 19.2%, compared to 1.3% in Zumbro falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Zumbro falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 14.5% in Lumberton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.