Demographics details for Zumbro falls, MN vs Gloverville, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Zumbro falls, MN vs Gloverville, SC.

Data Zumbro falls Gloverville
Population 155 3,099
Median Age 36.6 years 31.4 years
Median Income $84,750 $46,643
Married Families 46.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Gloverville

  • The population in Gloverville is higher at 3,099, compared to 155 in Zumbro falls.
  • Residents in Zumbro falls have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 31.4 years in Gloverville.
  • Zumbro falls has a higher median income of $84,750 compared to $46,643 in Gloverville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Zumbro falls at 46.0% compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gloverville at 12%, compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • Gloverville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Zumbro falls.

Demographics

Demographics Zumbro falls vs Gloverville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Zumbro falls Gloverville
Black Data is updating 18
White 99 76
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 6
Two or More Races 1 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Gloverville

  • In Gloverville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • Zumbro falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 76% in Gloverville.
  • Both Zumbro falls and Gloverville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Gloverville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Zumbro falls at 1% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zumbro falls and Gloverville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Zumbro falls Gloverville
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 20.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 15.8%
Depression 23.3% 24.7%
Smoking 17.2% 25.0%
Binge Drinking 21.7% 16.1%
Obesity 36.5% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Gloverville

  • In Gloverville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 14.4% in Zumbro falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Gloverville at 24.7% versus 23.3% in Zumbro falls.
  • Gloverville has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 17.2% in Zumbro falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Zumbro falls at 21.7% compared to 16.1% in Gloverville.
  • Gloverville has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 36.5% in Zumbro falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gloverville at 24.0% compared to 5.0% in Zumbro falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Zumbro falls Gloverville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (25)
High School Diploma 17.4% (27) 29.9% (927)
Less than High School 1.3% (2) 19.7% (610)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.9% (34) 4.3% (134)

Education Levels Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Gloverville

  • In Gloverville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Zumbro falls.
  • In Gloverville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 17.4% in Zumbro falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gloverville at 19.7%, compared to 1.3% in Zumbro falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Zumbro falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.