Demographics details for Zumbro falls, MN vs Crosbyton, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Zumbro falls, MN vs Crosbyton, TX.

Data Zumbro falls Crosbyton
Population 155 1,461
Median Age 36.6 years 39.1 years
Median Income $84,750 $47,083
Married Families 46.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 22%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Crosbyton

  • The population in Crosbyton is higher at 1,461, compared to 155 in Zumbro falls.
  • The median age in Crosbyton is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 36.6 years in Zumbro falls.
  • Zumbro falls has a higher median income of $84,750 compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Zumbro falls at 46.0% compared to 44.0% in Crosbyton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Crosbyton at 22%, compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • Crosbyton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Zumbro falls.

Demographics

Demographics Zumbro falls vs Crosbyton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Zumbro falls Crosbyton
Black Data is updating 3
White 99 6
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 75
Two or More Races 1 16
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Crosbyton

  • In Crosbyton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • Zumbro falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
  • Both Zumbro falls and Crosbyton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Crosbyton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 0% in Zumbro falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crosbyton at 16%, compared to 1% in Zumbro falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zumbro falls and Crosbyton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Zumbro falls Crosbyton
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 15.6%
Depression 23.3% 23.6%
Smoking 17.2% 20.5%
Binge Drinking 21.7% 15.4%
Obesity 36.5% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Crosbyton

  • In Crosbyton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.4% in Zumbro falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crosbyton at 23.6% versus 23.3% in Zumbro falls.
  • Crosbyton has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 17.2% in Zumbro falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Zumbro falls at 21.7% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
  • Crosbyton has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 36.5% in Zumbro falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 5.0% in Zumbro falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Zumbro falls Crosbyton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.1% (30)
High School Diploma 17.4% (27) 24.6% (359)
Less than High School 1.3% (2) 37.1% (542)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.9% (34) 8.8% (129)

Education Levels Comparison: Zumbro falls vs Crosbyton

  • In Crosbyton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Zumbro falls.
  • In Crosbyton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 17.4% in Zumbro falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crosbyton at 37.1%, compared to 1.3% in Zumbro falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Zumbro falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.