Demographics details for Zionsville, IN vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Zionsville, IN vs South jordan, UT.

Data Zionsville South jordan
Population 31,982 83,513
Median Age 41.8 years 34.4 years
Median Income $152,788 $119,822
Married Families 54.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.7

Population Comparison: Zionsville vs South jordan

  • The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 31,982 in Zionsville.
  • Residents in Zionsville have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • Zionsville has a higher median income of $152,788 compared to $119,822 in South jordan.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Zionsville at 54.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
  • The poverty level is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 0% in Zionsville.
  • South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.6% in Zionsville.

Demographics

Demographics Zionsville vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Zionsville South jordan
Black 2 Data is updating
White 87 83
Asian 5 4
Hispanic 3 7
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Zionsville vs South jordan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Zionsville at 2% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • Zionsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • The Asian population is larger in Zionsville at 5% compared to 4% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Zionsville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 3% in Zionsville.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Zionsville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Zionsville South jordan
Mental Health Not Good 12.8% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.5% 9.0%
Depression 21.6% 26.5%
Smoking 10.0% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 16.9%
Obesity 32.1% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Zionsville vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.8% in Zionsville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 21.6% in Zionsville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Zionsville at 10.0% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Zionsville at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Zionsville at 32.1% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Zionsville and South jordan at 6.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Zionsville South jordan
No Schooling 0.2% (70) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 6.3% (2,001) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 2.4% (782) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.4% (14,533) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Zionsville vs South jordan

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Zionsville and South jordan at 0.2%.
  • In South jordan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.4% compared to 6.3% in Zionsville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South jordan at 2.7%, compared to 2.4% in Zionsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Zionsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.4% compared to 27.1% in South jordan.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.