Demographics details for Zanesville, OH vs Union city, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Zanesville, OH vs Union city, GA.

Data Zanesville Union city
Population 24,600 27,895
Median Age 38.1 years 32.7 years
Median Income $40,927 $46,696
Married Families 25.0% 17.0%
Poverty Level 11% 16%
Unemployment Rate 6.0 6.1

Population Comparison: Zanesville vs Union city

  • The population in Union city is higher at 27,895, compared to 24,600 in Zanesville.
  • Residents in Zanesville have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
  • Union city has a higher median income of $46,696, compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Zanesville at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 11% in Zanesville.
  • Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 6.0% in Zanesville.

Demographics

Demographics Zanesville vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Zanesville Union city
Black 9 85
White 79 6
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Zanesville vs Union city

  • In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 9% in Zanesville.
  • Zanesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 6% in Union city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Zanesville at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
  • Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Zanesville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Zanesville at 8% compared to 4% in Union city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zanesville and Union city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Zanesville Union city
Mental Health Not Good 20.8% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 12.2%
Depression 26.7% 17.2%
Smoking 25.8% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 13.5%
Obesity 47.8% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Zanesville vs Union city

  • More residents in Zanesville report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Zanesville at 26.7% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Zanesville at 25.8% compared to 18.0% in Union city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Zanesville at 47.8% compared to 36.6% in Union city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Zanesville at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Zanesville Union city
No Schooling 1.6% (389) 0.5% (129)
High School Diploma 26.5% (6,510) 13.2% (3,681)
Less than High School 17.8% (4,373) 7.8% (2,166)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.0% (2,214) 17.3% (4,828)

Education Levels Comparison: Zanesville vs Union city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
  • More residents in Zanesville have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
  • In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.