Demographics details for Zanesville, OH vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Zanesville, OH vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Zanesville | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,600 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $40,927 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Zanesville vs Sulphur
- In Zanesville, the population is higher at 24,600, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Sulphur is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 38.1 years in Zanesville.
- Sulphur has a higher median income of $55,951, compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 14%, compared to 11% in Zanesville.
- The unemployment rate in Zanesville is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Zanesville vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Zanesville | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 2 |
| White | 79 | 60 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Zanesville vs Sulphur
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Zanesville at 9% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- Zanesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- The Asian population is larger in Zanesville at 1% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Zanesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 8% in Zanesville.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Zanesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Zanesville | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 25.8% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 47.8% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Zanesville vs Sulphur
- More residents in Zanesville report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 19.2% in Sulphur.
- Depression is more prevalent in Zanesville at 26.7% compared to 25.3% in Sulphur.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Zanesville at 25.8% compared to 21.4% in Sulphur.
- Binge drinking is more common in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Zanesville at 47.8% compared to 40.7% in Sulphur.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Zanesville and Sulphur at 19.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Zanesville | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (389) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 26.5% (6,510) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (4,373) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (2,214) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Zanesville vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Zanesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 18.2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 17.8% in Zanesville.
- In Sulphur, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.