Demographics details for Zanesville, OH vs Rockville centre, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Zanesville, OH vs Rockville centre, NY.

Data Zanesville Rockville centre
Population 24,600 25,662
Median Age 38.1 years 43.6 years
Median Income $40,927 $147,361
Married Families 25.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 11% 5%
Unemployment Rate 6.0 3.1

Population Comparison: Zanesville vs Rockville centre

  • The population in Rockville centre is higher at 25,662, compared to 24,600 in Zanesville.
  • The median age in Rockville centre is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 38.1 years in Zanesville.
  • Rockville centre has a higher median income of $147,361, compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
  • In Rockville centre, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
  • Zanesville has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Rockville centre.
  • The unemployment rate in Zanesville is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.1% in Rockville centre.

Demographics

Demographics Zanesville vs Rockville centre provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Zanesville Rockville centre
Black 9 4
White 79 77
Asian 1 6
Hispanic 3 9
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Zanesville vs Rockville centre

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Zanesville at 9% compared to 4% in Rockville centre.
  • Zanesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 77% in Rockville centre.
  • In Rockville centre, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Zanesville.
  • Rockville centre has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Zanesville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Zanesville at 8% compared to 4% in Rockville centre.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zanesville and Rockville centre at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Zanesville Rockville centre
Mental Health Not Good 20.8% 12.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 7.5%
Depression 26.7% 16.9%
Smoking 25.8% 9.7%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 18.5%
Obesity 47.8% 26.0%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Zanesville vs Rockville centre

  • More residents in Zanesville report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 12.8% in Rockville centre.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Zanesville at 26.7% compared to 16.9% in Rockville centre.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Zanesville at 25.8% compared to 9.7% in Rockville centre.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockville centre at 18.5% compared to 16.6% in Zanesville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Zanesville at 47.8% compared to 26.0% in Rockville centre.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Zanesville at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Rockville centre.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Zanesville Rockville centre
No Schooling 1.6% (389) 0.8% (200)
High School Diploma 26.5% (6,510) 9.4% (2,406)
Less than High School 17.8% (4,373) 6.2% (1,582)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.0% (2,214) 44.6% (11,456)

Education Levels Comparison: Zanesville vs Rockville centre

  • A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Rockville centre.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 9.4% in Rockville centre.
  • More residents in Zanesville have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 6.2% in Rockville centre.
  • In Rockville centre, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.