Demographics details for Zanesville, OH vs Martinsdale, MT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Zanesville, OH vs Martinsdale, MT.

Data Zanesville Martinsdale
Population 24,600 37
Median Age 38.1 years 40.8 years
Median Income $40,927 $55,489
Married Families 25.0% Data is updating
Poverty Level 11% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 6.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Zanesville vs Martinsdale

  • In Zanesville, the population is higher at 24,600, compared to 37 in Martinsdale.
  • The median age in Martinsdale is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 38.1 years in Zanesville.
  • Martinsdale has a higher median income of $55,489, compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Zanesville at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • Zanesville has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The unemployment rate in Zanesville is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.2% in Martinsdale.

Demographics

Demographics Zanesville vs Martinsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Zanesville Martinsdale
Black 9 Data is updating
White 79 100
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Zanesville vs Martinsdale

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Zanesville at 9% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Martinsdale at 100% compared to 79% in Zanesville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Zanesville at 1% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Zanesville at 3% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Zanesville at 8% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zanesville and Martinsdale at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Zanesville Martinsdale
Mental Health Not Good 20.8% 12.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 14.4%
Depression 26.7% 20.1%
Smoking 25.8% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 14.5%
Obesity 47.8% 35.3%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Zanesville vs Martinsdale

  • More residents in Zanesville report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 12.2% in Martinsdale.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Zanesville at 26.7% compared to 20.1% in Martinsdale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Zanesville at 25.8% compared to 16.8% in Martinsdale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 14.5% in Martinsdale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Zanesville at 47.8% compared to 35.3% in Martinsdale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Martinsdale at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Zanesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Zanesville Martinsdale
No Schooling 1.6% (389) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 26.5% (6,510) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 17.8% (4,373) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.0% (2,214) 81.1% (30)

Education Levels Comparison: Zanesville vs Martinsdale

  • A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • More residents in Zanesville have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • In Martinsdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 81.1% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.