Demographics details for Zanesville, OH vs Kingsburg, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Zanesville, OH vs Kingsburg, CA.
Data | Zanesville | Kingsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,600 | 12,613 |
Median Age | 38.1 years | 37.6 years |
Median Income | $40,927 | $74,897 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Zanesville vs Kingsburg
- In Zanesville, the population is higher at 24,600, compared to 12,613 in Kingsburg.
- Residents in Zanesville have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 37.6 years in Kingsburg.
- Kingsburg has a higher median income of $74,897, compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
- In Kingsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Kingsburg at 12%, compared to 11% in Zanesville.
- The unemployment rate in Zanesville is higher at 6.0%, compared to 4.2% in Kingsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Zanesville vs Kingsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Zanesville | Kingsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 1 |
White | 79 | 32 |
Asian | 1 | 7 |
Hispanic | 3 | 46 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Zanesville vs Kingsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Zanesville at 9% compared to 1% in Kingsburg.
- Zanesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 32% in Kingsburg.
- In Kingsburg, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Zanesville.
- Kingsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 3% in Zanesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kingsburg at 14%, compared to 8% in Zanesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zanesville and Kingsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Zanesville | Kingsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 11.0% |
Depression | 26.7% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 25.8% | 12.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 47.8% | 34.5% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Zanesville vs Kingsburg
- More residents in Zanesville report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.1% in Kingsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Zanesville at 26.7% compared to 17.9% in Kingsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Zanesville at 25.8% compared to 12.1% in Kingsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 15.9% in Kingsburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Zanesville at 47.8% compared to 34.5% in Kingsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Zanesville at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Kingsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Zanesville | Kingsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (389) | 1.1% (144) |
High School Diploma | 26.5% (6,510) | 17.2% (2,168) |
Less than High School | 17.8% (4,373) | 17.8% (2,242) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (2,214) | 13.8% (1,739) |
Education Levels Comparison: Zanesville vs Kingsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.1% in Kingsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Zanesville hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 17.2% in Kingsburg.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 17.8%.
- In Kingsburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.