Demographics details for Zachary, LA vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Zachary, LA vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
| Data | Zachary | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,916 | 4,216 |
| Median Age | 33.3 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $88,811 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Zachary vs Ho ho kus
- In Zachary, the population is higher at 19,916, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 33.3 years in Zachary.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $88,811 in Zachary.
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 39.0% in Zachary.
- Zachary has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in Zachary is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Zachary vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Zachary | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 48 | 1 |
| White | 48 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 12 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Zachary vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Zachary at 48% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ho ho kus at 67% compared to 48% in Zachary.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Zachary.
- Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Zachary.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ho ho kus at 8%, compared to 2% in Zachary.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zachary and Ho ho kus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Zachary | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 11.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 5.8% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 6.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Zachary vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in Zachary report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Zachary at 25.3% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Zachary at 16.0% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 18.5% in Zachary.
- Obesity rates are higher in Zachary at 34.1% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Zachary at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Zachary | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (133) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (3,621) | 2.8% (117) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (1,109) | 2.0% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (4,617) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Zachary vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of residents in Zachary have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Zachary hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents in Zachary have less than a high school education at 5.6% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 23.2% in Zachary.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.