Demographics details for Zachary, LA vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Zachary, LA vs Flomaton, AL.
| Data | Zachary | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,916 | 1,458 |
| Median Age | 33.3 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $88,811 | $37,500 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Zachary vs Flomaton
- In Zachary, the population is higher at 19,916, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- Residents in Zachary have a higher median age of 33.3 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Zachary has a higher median income of $88,811 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Zachary at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 12% in Zachary.
- Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Zachary.
Demographics
Demographics Zachary vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Zachary | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 48 | 38 |
| White | 48 | 58 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Zachary vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Zachary at 48% compared to 38% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Flomaton at 58% compared to 48% in Zachary.
- The Asian population is larger in Zachary at 2% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Zachary and Flomaton at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flomaton at 4%, compared to 2% in Zachary.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zachary and Flomaton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Zachary | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 45.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Zachary vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.0% in Zachary.
- Depression is more prevalent in Zachary at 25.3% compared to 24.6% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 16.0% in Zachary.
- Binge drinking is more common in Zachary at 18.5% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 34.1% in Zachary.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Zachary.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Zachary | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (133) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (3,621) | 25.0% (364) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (1,109) | 19.1% (278) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (4,617) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Zachary vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of residents in Zachary have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 18.2% in Zachary.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 5.6% in Zachary.
- A higher percentage of residents in Zachary hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.