Demographics details for Zachary, LA vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Zachary, LA vs Ephrata, WA.
Data | Zachary | Ephrata |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,916 | 8,476 |
Median Age | 33.3 years | 33.4 years |
Median Income | $88,811 | $57,958 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Zachary vs Ephrata
- In Zachary, the population is higher at 19,916, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- The median age in Ephrata is higher at 33.4 years, compared to 33.3 years in Zachary.
- Zachary has a higher median income of $88,811 compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Zachary at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- Zachary has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Zachary and Ephrata at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Zachary vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Zachary | Ephrata |
---|---|---|
Black | 48 | 1 |
White | 48 | 63 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Zachary vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Zachary at 48% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephrata at 63% compared to 48% in Zachary.
- The Asian population is larger in Zachary at 2% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Zachary.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 2% in Zachary.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Zachary and Ephrata at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Zachary | Ephrata |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.7% |
Depression | 25.3% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 34.1% | 35.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Zachary vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Zachary.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 25.3% in Zachary.
- Ephrata has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Zachary.
- Binge drinking is more common in Zachary at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 34.1% in Zachary.
- Disability percentages are higher in Zachary at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Zachary | Ephrata |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (133) | 0.8% (65) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (3,621) | 17.7% (1,503) |
Less than High School | 5.6% (1,109) | 14.4% (1,223) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (4,617) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Zachary vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Zachary.
- A higher percentage of residents in Zachary hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ephrata at 14.4%, compared to 5.6% in Zachary.
- A higher percentage of residents in Zachary hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.