Demographics details for Yuma, AZ vs San francisco, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yuma, AZ vs San francisco, CA.
| Data | Yuma | San francisco |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 98,527 | 808,437 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $59,312 | $136,689 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 9.0 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Yuma vs San francisco
- The population in San francisco is higher at 808,437, compared to 98,527 in Yuma.
- The median age in San francisco is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
- San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689, compared to $59,312 in Yuma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Yuma at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in San francisco.
- Yuma has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in San francisco.
- The unemployment rate in Yuma is higher at 9.0%, compared to 3.6% in San francisco.
Demographics
Demographics Yuma vs San francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yuma | San francisco |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 13 | 31 |
| Asian | 2 | 37 |
| Hispanic | 61 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Yuma vs San francisco
- In San francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Yuma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in San francisco at 31% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- In San francisco, the Asian population stands at 37%, greater than 2% in Yuma.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yuma at 61% compared to 16% in San francisco.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yuma at 21% compared to 10% in San francisco.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yuma and San francisco at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yuma | San francisco |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 15.7% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 9.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 19.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yuma vs San francisco
- More residents in Yuma report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yuma at 19.3% compared to 15.7% in San francisco.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yuma at 16.2% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yuma at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yuma at 39.5% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
- Disability percentages are higher in Yuma at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yuma | San francisco |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,642) | 3.0% (23,928) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (13,054) | 8.5% (68,418) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (19,520) | 12.4% (99,947) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (12,116) | 50.3% (406,774) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yuma vs San francisco
- In San francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Yuma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Yuma hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
- More residents in Yuma have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 12.4% in San francisco.
- In San francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.