Demographics details for Yuma, AZ vs Pleasant hill, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yuma, AZ vs Pleasant hill, OR.
| Data | Yuma | Pleasant hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 98,527 | 5,046 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 48.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,312 | $77,188 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 9.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Yuma vs Pleasant hill
- In Yuma, the population is higher at 98,527, compared to 5,046 in Pleasant hill.
- The median age in Pleasant hill is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
- Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $77,188, compared to $59,312 in Yuma.
- In Pleasant hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 39.0% in Yuma.
- Yuma has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Pleasant hill.
- The unemployment rate in Yuma is higher at 9.0%, compared to 4.2% in Pleasant hill.
Demographics
Demographics Yuma vs Pleasant hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yuma | Pleasant hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 13 | 92 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 61 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Yuma vs Pleasant hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yuma at 2% compared to 1% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant hill at 92% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- The Asian population is larger in Yuma at 2% compared to 1% in Pleasant hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yuma at 61% compared to 2% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yuma at 21% compared to 3% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Yuma and Pleasant hill at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yuma | Pleasant hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 19.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yuma vs Pleasant hill
- More residents in Yuma report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yuma at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yuma at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yuma at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yuma at 39.5% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pleasant hill at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Yuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yuma | Pleasant hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,642) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (13,054) | 16.9% (852) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (19,520) | 8.2% (414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (12,116) | 19.1% (965) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yuma vs Pleasant hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Yuma have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.1% in Pleasant hill.
- In Pleasant hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 13.2% in Yuma.
- More residents in Yuma have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 8.2% in Pleasant hill.
- In Pleasant hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.