Demographics details for Yuma, AZ vs Clayton, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Yuma, AZ vs Clayton, NY.
| Data | Yuma | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 98,527 | 4,781 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,312 | $74,471 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 9.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Yuma vs Clayton
- In Yuma, the population is higher at 98,527, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471, compared to $59,312 in Yuma.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 39.0% in Yuma.
- Yuma has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Yuma is higher at 9.0%, compared to 4.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Yuma vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Yuma | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 13 | 95 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 61 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Yuma vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Yuma at 2% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 95% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- The Asian population is larger in Yuma at 2% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Yuma at 61% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Yuma at 21% compared to 4% in Clayton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Yuma at 1% compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Yuma | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 19.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Yuma vs Clayton
- More residents in Yuma report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Yuma at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Yuma at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Yuma at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Yuma at 39.5% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Yuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Yuma | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,642) | 0.1% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (13,054) | 18.3% (874) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (19,520) | 14.2% (679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (12,116) | 20.6% (983) |
Education Levels Comparison: Yuma vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Yuma have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 13.2% in Yuma.
- More residents in Yuma have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 14.2% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.